Your Source for Becker College News
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jun | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
I would prefer an older Clint Eastwood film or an ambiguous Scorsese film as opposed to a modern “shoot ‘em up” action film. Would it be absolutely asinine to assume that most movies in 2010 are being produced purely on shock effect or tantalizingly appealing content? So I pose a question to you. Do you feel technology is creating less interesting movies or has technology gotten us out of the “BOOM” and “POW” era? Personally, I feel movies rely too much on shock effect and special effects than an ambiguous storyline. Hopefully Ironman 2 has a nice mixture of both an ambiguous plot and an action packed “shoot ‘em up” thriller. But; that’s the best part of going to the movies; everyone has their own opinion. So, essentially, the ambiguous aspect of seeing a movie will never be replaced or completely depleted.
Continue reading about Ironman II: The Ambiguity of Technology »
Posted in Cinema Review, Opinion
